- George Tonks full sessions (May 20, May 31, June 1, June 2, 2026)
- Molly Skye Brown full sessions (June 2, 2026 — Sessions 1 and 2)
- Lisa Noelle Voldeng screen-recording extracts (June 21, 2026)
- Lady Victoria Hervey clips (six public clips)
- Jennifer Engelsma (Texas Grumble) TikTok video (May 24, 2026)
- All video evidence (TikTok clips, screen recordings)
- Timeline of events (public facts only)
- Habeas explainer (public legal backdrop)
- I Was Right (confirmed predictions vs. public record)
- Petition Risk Crosswalk (structure and analysis)
- Briefing sheets for attorneys, journalists, and congressional staff
- All pages on this site except gated audio
- Samantha Harris — May 31, 2026 — Full recording (Clip 001)
- Samantha Harris — May 31, 2026 — Clips 002–014
- Habeas and retrial language (attorney-chain clips)
- Sealed-status language (attorney-chain clips)
- Live-habeas statement clips
- Witness credibility and identity clips
- Judge authority language clips
- Evidence-use discussion clips
- Authentication copies A and B
- Habeas transcript excerpts (habeas.html gate)
- Full raw original audio files (uncompressed)
- Metadata-preserved source files with original device data
- February 2026 email lead to Maxwell counsel (protected exhibit)
- Full 4-hour George–Sherry session
- Full Lisa Voldeng screen-recording sessions (complete)
- Screenshot pipeline originals (with full metadata)
- Chain-of-custody documentation
- Private communications with sources
- Legal strategy materials (attorney-client if counsel retained)
- Additional exhibits not yet published
Why some evidence is controlled
The Samantha Harris recording names Maxwell's defense attorney by name and contains language directly tied to the habeas petition's legal categories. Publishing it without authentication, without legal context, and without review by qualified attorneys risks misuse, mischaracterization, and harm to the integrity of the evidence itself.
Troy has every document and recording he claims to have. He will provide those materials to the right people, not to everyone. The control is not about protecting Troy. It is about protecting the legal value of what he holds.
What Troy is asking qualified reviewers to do
- Listen to or review the audio with fresh ears and no predetermined conclusion.
- Apply your professional judgment about whether the language is significant.
- Evaluate the chain of custody and authentication documentation.
- Compare the audio pattern to the habeas categories in the crosswalk.
- Determine whether this material belongs in front of a court, a congressional committee, or a newsroom with editorial resources to investigate further.
Troy is not asking reviewers to agree with his conclusions. He is asking qualified people to review the record and reach their own.