Journalists, attorneys, congressional staff, investigators, and advocacy organizations who want to review the full archive or speak with me directly. This is not a general tips form.
How to reach me
What the archive establishes
These are the questions an attorney will ask, and where I stand on each. The evidence is on this site.
- Was the danger frame built on false claims? Yes. The list attributed to me was a fabrication, and George says so on the recording. I never exposed a victim. The framing of my reporting as interference and of me as an aggressor is false on its face. The false claims came first, and the agencies came after.
- Is the Substack suspension platform harm tied to my journalism? Yes. My publication was suspended on June 9, after the agency sequence, killing thirty-eight parts of The Machine and my income in a single day. June 9 was also the reply deadline in the Maxwell post-conviction matter.
- Is the audio relevant to the Maxwell habeas proceeding? Yes. Samantha names Maxwell's own attorney, Leah Saffian, as the source, and lays out a next-round strategy to discredit a trial witness. That belongs in front of the court and the prosecution.
- Is there defamation exposure for how I was characterized? Yes, in my view, for more than one person. The public TikTok telling me to panic, the fabricated list, the schizophrenia smear, and the doxing claim are all documented and all false.
- Is there recourse for the economic harm? I believe there is, and I am seeking counsel to pursue it.
I am looking for an attorney who can review the archive and advise on transmission routes to the court, liability, and protective measures.
What is in the review packet
Full transcripts
The long George session, the Samantha Harris call, the Molly Skye Brown recording, and the Threads audio.
Request requiredThe recordings
Authentic recordings with original metadata, organized by speaker and date. Quotes and timestamps are on the audio page.
On this siteCourt packets and evidence report
The four congressional transmission packets and the Master Evidence Report.
AvailableFor congressional contacts
The four Court Window packets transmitted on June 22 to 23 are available on request. The transmittal asks for same-day secure intake because the habeas timeline is live. The specific request is for the Senate and House Judiciary Committees to review whether the sequence of agency contacts, platform loss, and public-narrative inversion around a reporter covering Maxwell material is a pattern that requires congressional attention.
For journalists
I reported under my real name from the start. I built a substantial archive before any of this began. My name entered the danger frame without any public action on my part that threatened anyone. The sequence is documented, in order, across this site. If you are covering Maxwell, Epstein, or the post-conviction lane, the audio contains source material relevant to your reporting, and it places defense-attorney language and post-conviction strategy next to the people running a danger narrative about me. Review that before you publish a story built on one side of it. Write to thegoodarchivist@proton.me for a secure briefing.
What I am not asking for
I am not asking anyone to harass, threaten, mass-report, or contact any person named here. I am not asking the public to decide the Maxwell case. I am asking for professional review of a sequence that is too serious to ignore.